<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spin Down Idle USB Drives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everydaylht.com/howtos/multimedia/spin-down-idle-usb-drives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everydaylht.com</link>
	<description>understandable linux tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:07:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://everydaylht.com/howtos/multimedia/spin-down-idle-usb-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-9559</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydaylht.com/?page_id=311#comment-9559</guid>
		<description>You can use udev to make sure you always get the same device name on the drive, thus removing the need to figure out the name in the script : http://blog.wains.be/2010/04/10/udev-always-the-same-device-name-for-your-usb-drives/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use udev to make sure you always get the same device name on the drive, thus removing the need to figure out the name in the script : <a href="http://blog.wains.be/2010/04/10/udev-always-the-same-device-name-for-your-usb-drives/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wains.be/2010/04/10/udev-always-the-same-device-name-for-your-usb-drives/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://everydaylht.com/howtos/multimedia/spin-down-idle-usb-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-3774</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydaylht.com/?page_id=311#comment-3774</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the script again.  1395504092814fe03e55b65c7a58c3ec000 doesnt make any sense.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the script again.  1395504092814fe03e55b65c7a58c3ec000 doesnt make any sense.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo</title>
		<link>http://everydaylht.com/howtos/multimedia/spin-down-idle-usb-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydaylht.com/?page_id=311#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>Nice tutorial, thanks. Why Ubuntu uses dash: &quot;The major reason to switch the default shell was efficiency. bash  is an excellent full-featured shell appropriate for interactive use; indeed, it is still the default login shell. However, it is rather large and slow to start up and operate by comparison with dash. A large number of shell instances are started as part of the Ubuntu boot process. Rather than change each of them individually to run explicitly under /bin/dash, a change which would require significant ongoing maintenance and which would be liable to regress if not paid close attention, the Ubuntu core development team felt that it was best simply to change the default shell. The boot speed improvements in Ubuntu 6.10 were often incorrectly attributed to Upstart, which is a fine platform for future development of the init system but in Ubuntu 6.10 was primarily running in System V compatibility mode with only small behavioural changes. These improvements were in fact largely due to the changed /bin/sh. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tutorial, thanks. Why Ubuntu uses dash: &#8220;The major reason to switch the default shell was efficiency. bash  is an excellent full-featured shell appropriate for interactive use; indeed, it is still the default login shell. However, it is rather large and slow to start up and operate by comparison with dash. A large number of shell instances are started as part of the Ubuntu boot process. Rather than change each of them individually to run explicitly under /bin/dash, a change which would require significant ongoing maintenance and which would be liable to regress if not paid close attention, the Ubuntu core development team felt that it was best simply to change the default shell. The boot speed improvements in Ubuntu 6.10 were often incorrectly attributed to Upstart, which is a fine platform for future development of the init system but in Ubuntu 6.10 was primarily running in System V compatibility mode with only small behavioural changes. These improvements were in fact largely due to the changed /bin/sh. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

